Beer Marketer's Insights

Beer Marketer's Insights

There’s mounting frustration among Miller distribs concerning lack of spending in peak-selling season compared to competition. "The system’s concerns are understandable," sr veep mktg Bob Mikulay told INSIGHTS, acknowledging distribs’ beef legit. "While we’ve upped our spending vs a year ago, the competitors have as well. We’re trying to address that" by "shifting" spending and by adding "weight," Bob said. Many Miller distribs don’t like current Miller Lite commercials much, but they would still like to see more of ‘em (or preferably new ads) on the air. Last summer distributors actually welcomed absence of spending, because they felt ads were detrimental to brand. This yr, distribs increasingly vocal about Miller’s relative absence of media weight.

The news that Miller lost its co-exclusive slot on Monday Night Football this yr was another shock to many distribs. That was key vehicle back in 70s which originally helped build Miller Lite brand. Making it even tuffer: Coors stepped right in and picked up the time. Less than 2 yrs ago, Miller gave up another key sports property; official sponsorship of the NBA, which AB immediately pounced on. Miller in process of strategic overhaul of spending. Bob Mikulay said "we think we can be more efficient." For instance, Miller can "make our reach more broad and impactful for our core audience" with "commercials on a variety of key programs" instead of being excessively "tied up on single properties."

Meanwhile, Miller will reportedly make less money than anticipated in 2d qtr. Miller profits will still be up 8-9%, but prior expectations were for 15% profit growth, wrote Bill Pecoriello of Sanford Bernstein. Word is that Miller volume below budget too even tho Miller Lite reasonably healthy. In some hi-share areas, Miller is doing very well on many brands. But its total volume trends are dragged down by significant drops on subpremium brands. In a Miller meeting last week with 16 Miller gms from around country, sr mgt discussed how to make up volume shortfall. Reportedly, Miller will stick with its strategy of "premium brands at premium prices." But in a few areas, Miller has not been as competitive on promotion discounting and will fine tune its executions.

Recently, Miller had what Ad Age termed a "shakeup" in its mktg staff as Gen Draft director left and Lite director moved. Ad Age focused on internal tensions at Miller based on relationship with lead Lite agency Ogilvy & Mather, writing that not all Miller brand folks on same page on ads, tactics etc. Bob Mikulay sez some Miller Lite ads "didn’t live up to expectations" and "the importance of getting the right ads" does "dial up the sense of urgency." But situation was "blown out-of proportion" in recent media articles.

Chart below shows that beginning in 94, import/specialty picked up at least 2 mil bbls a yr like clockwork for 5 yrs. But import/specialty only gained 1.5 mil bbls in 99. Interestingly, the 1/2 mil difference in growth about same as AB’s Tequiza volume (570,000 bbls) in intro yr. Clearly, import price increases slowed growth last yr. Did Tequiza play role too? In any case, neither will be as much of a factor in yr 2000 (Tequiza way off in supers this yr). Another point: 94-96 imports and specialty split 2 mil bbls almost evenly, while 97-99 it was virtually all imports. At same time, all other brewers as a group lost volume each yr from 91 thru 97, held in 98, finally gained in 99. All told, that group of brewers, despite big gains by AB and Coors, shipped 5 mil bbls less in 99 than in 89. (Same brewers shipped 10 mil bbls less in 99 than 90, shipments inflated in 90 because of pending excise tax increase 1/91.) Then too, the 99 "Other Brewers" figure includes 2.5 mil+ bbls of malt-based coolers, lemon-brews, etc that didn’t exist in 89. Another point/correction: Our "other brewers" figure here includes Tequiza which was mistakenly left out of BMI "superpremium" figure in Vol 31, No 11 article on segments.

Import Specialty Import/
Specialty
Other Brewers Imp/Spec
Bbls % Chg Bbls % Chg Bbls % Chg Bbls % Chg Share
1989 8,802 775 9,577 179,422 5.1
1990 8,922 1.4 1,015 31.0 9,937 3.8 184,842 3.0 5.1
1991 8,031 -10.0 1,264 24.5 9,295 -6.5 181,892 -1.6 4.9
1992 8,408 4.7 1,611 27.5 10,019 7.8 181,501 -0.2 5.2
1993 9,348 11.2 2,168 34.6 11,516 14.9 180,947 -0.3 6.0
1994 10,602 13.4 3,124 44.1 13,726 19.2 178,512 -1.3 7.1
1995 11,394 7.5 4,393 40.6 15,787 15.0 174,460 -2.3 8.3
1996 12,557 10.2 5,529 25.9 18,086 14.6 174,272 -0.1 9.4
1997 14,324 14.1 5,821 5.3 20,145 11.4 173,263 -0.6 10.4
1998 16,446 14.8 5,825 0.1 22,271 10.6 173,320 0.0 11.4
1999 17,897 8.8 5,900 1.3 23,797 6.9 174,835 0.9 12.0

As good as sales are, it’s kinda surprising that there are so many top mgt or structural changes at big importers. This latest round of changes ain't related to sales. Heineken USA just got new prexy Frank Van Der Minne in last mo following departure on Aug 31 of Michael Foley (who leaves to run Aer Lingus). Michael leaves on high-note: Heineken had very good 99 and strong 1st half 2000. Gained 1.3 mil bbls, 50% in 7 yrs he was there. Beck’s searching for new ceo. Beck’s North America prexy Bill Yetman will "be part of" new "top level management team to evaluate" international opportunities, according to statement by BNA chairman Michael Muller. "To replace Bill, we are looking for a top marketer who can work with" current mgt team. Bill "will continue to be" prexy and ceo "until our new management structure is finalized." Guinness parent co Diageo undergoing major structural overhaul and looks to combine Guinness and largest distiller UDV. "The move makes Guinness Stout a core part of its drink business and largely kills speculation that it could also be sold off," wrote Reuters. In fact, "as for further acquisitions, beer will be considered alongside spirits--but they would have to be premium brands without the drag of large brewing assets," wrote Financial Times.

Miller has new buy on CBS football and on Fox NFL all season long, Miller told distrib council meeting Jul 19-21. Miller also expanded its ESPN buy so that Miller Lite will be exclusive presenting sponsor of ESPN’s "NFL Primetime" program and Lite will be advertised during ESPN broadcasts in core mkts. This is "better allocation of our spending" with "more weight" than previous plan, sr veep sales Jim Mortensen told INSIGHTS. Miller also responded to those distribs who had felt local media weight insufficient. Pledged to make its local media buys earlier with longer-term commitments and to offer some minimum level ($$ tied to rating points) in every area in 2001. In small mkts, distribs will now decide what local media to buy. Miller approved a number of new commercials that will air later this yr but are presently held up by Screen Actor’s Guild strike.

On other issues: Miller will change its process so that it will pay distribs in 30 days or less on "returns, transfers" co-op ads etc. It will also eliminate annual fixed commitment for distrib spending on POS; that will be rolled into distrib’s biz plan. Distrib inventories will be cut on average 3 days by yr-end and on avg 1 additional day per yr thru 2004. Miller will announce in mid-Aug which SKUs it will cut as it eliminates 15% of ‘em. Miller’s plastic bottle selling well, but "pushing up against capacity limitations," Jim said, as plastic in tight supply. Miller exploring how to expand capacity. Miller also replaced another gm (Fla); it changed 8 of 16 in 16 mos.

Willow Dist in Dallas got summary judgment against Heineken as state ct affirmed that Heineken is "prohibited...from terminating the written distribution agreement" it had with Willow. Recall that Heineken sent termination letter to Willow (Coors distrib) Jan 99, wanted to move brand to Miller of Dallas. Never even claimed "good cause." Willow sued and won injunction and appeal then; now won summary judgment. A slam dunk so far. Court just ruled that under Tex law Heineken could not terminate without good cause by "agreeing to pay or paying ‘reasonable compensation’" to Willow. Willow won atty fees too. But another appeal still possible.

In Wisc, Guinness filed bare-bones answer to lawsuit by Beer Capitol that charged Guinness illegally terminated its agreement in order to move brands to AB distrib in Milwaukee. Guinness denied all charges. Argued Beer Capitol "fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted," and that claims barred by fraud statutes, by contract, and/or consent, and by statute of limitations. Tho Guinness didn’t file motion to dismiss, it "demands judgment dismissing" Beer Capitol’s complaint and asks for atty fees. Recall that Guinness has stated its Wisc moves are a "realignment" of distribs to improve efficiency and "drive value" for shareholders. Question is whether these business reasons will allow termination under Wisc law, which doesn't have same protections as Minn law.

In Fla, much-anticipated fed ct trial between ex-AB distrib Maris and AB over legality of AB’s ban of public ownership pushed back from Aug 7 to Sep 25. Meanwhile, in separate state ct action, judge dismissed AB charges vs Maris associate Irvin Philpot. AB had claimed Philpot had "tortiously interfered" with AB-Maris contract, but judge wrote that Philpot’s advice was attempt to "save the contract," not interfere with it. Judge also tossed AB’s RICO claims vs Philpot.

US Dist Ct judge in Minn stopped Miller from terminating distribs for not signing its Acquired Brands Contract after it bought brands from Pabst. Decision could be very important down the line as suppliers move to consolidate distribs. "A brewer’s legitimate business reason is not consistent with examples of ‘good cause’" for termination under Minn franchise law, the judge wrote. Miller had argued that "good cause" should be interpreted to include "a brewer’s legitimate business reason." Why? Minn franchise law’s good cause definition "contains the phrase ‘includes but is not limited to’" wholesaler deficiencies. But judge didn’t buy. Acknowledged that tho franchise law’s definition of good cause could be considered ambiguous, every example of good cause that was given in law "falls within the category of wholesaler performance or deficiency." And Miller never claimed that Minn distribs that had the acquired brands were deficient. What’s more, Minn franchise law explicitly states that "’the sale or purchase of a brewer’ does not constitute good cause" to terminate. Judge went even further. He noted that Miller’s interpretation would "render the ‘good cause’ requirement essentially meaningless and thus would not be consistent with the remedial purposes of the statute." Minn franchise law also requires opportunity for distribs to cure deficiencies; that provision would also be "rendered meaningless," wrote judge if good cause for termination were "outside the wholesaler’s control, such as a brewer’s legitimate business reason."

Atty Mike Madigan, who represented distribs here and who has successfully defended Minn franchise law against Miller challenges at least 3 times in last 10 yrs, told INSIGHTS: "This is an extremely significant decision for distributors because it clarifies that ‘good cause’ does not include brewers ‘legitimate business reasons.’ If Miller’s argument were adopted, it would eviscerate state franchise laws. Importantly, the judge also recognized that the state beer franchise law is ‘remedial legislation.’ As such, the beer franchise law is specifically designed to address the disparity in bargaining power between brewers and wholesalers." This decision as well as the Heineken-Willow decision in Tex (see below), underscores again the importance to distribs of having strong state franchise laws.

Strong sales trends and solid pricing drove Coors to double-digit profit increase (before special charge) in 2d qtr, even tho its cost of goods sold jumped sharply too. Coors had oper income of $12.77 per bbl in 2d qtr (not including $15.5 mil writedown of Spanish brewery), up 7% from $11.92 last yr. Coors earns about half its profits for yr in 2d qtr (AB and Miller get about 1/3 of profits in 2d qtr). In all of 99, Coors had oper income per bbl of $6.92. "Unprecedented demand pull in our largest quarter, combined with modest pricing drove our good results... while stressing our ability to support distributor inventories," Coors prexy Leo Kiely told analysts. Coors had "strong sales for key" Memorial Day and July 4th weekends, and top 5 Coors brands up for 3d qtr in a row. Demand "outstripped our capacity" on 30-packs and 18-packs, added Leo. Beer biz this yr "moved even more than in 1999 toward value-packs." Tho Coors had anticipated this, "we are chasing value packs with the greatest strain on Keystone brand," he pointed out.

Coors cost of goods sold up 7% per bbl in 2d qtr; it expects about 3.5% increase per bbl in 2d half. "Mix shift toward sales of more expensive products and packages" accounted for 2/3 of increase, said cfo Tim Wolf. Those included "long neck bottles, imported beers sold by" branches and Zima. Coors rev per bbl up 3.2% in 2d qtr, including price increases (1.5%), mix shift etc. Coors "maintained higher domestic pricing in key markets," but faced "modestly higher" discount spend-back, "mostly in the form of value-packs." Tho Coors mktg, gen and admin spend down slightly in 2d qtr, Coors "increased spending significantly" on mktg, reportedly around 5%. Shutting Spanish brewery will save Coors $7-8 mil per yr. At end of 2d qtr, Coors had $344 mil in cash, $105 mil in longterm debt. Coors inventories 150,000 bbls lower in 2d qtr 2000 than 2d qtr 99. If you added that to Coors total, its shipments would have jumped 5.8% in 2d qtr.

Since Miller revs up 2.8% while volume down 2.7% (and contract brewing apparently not on rev line), implies Miller’s rev per bbl up about 5% in 2d qtr. Compare that to 2% at AB and 3% at Coors. Miller’s higher prices undoubtedly contributed to its volume decline. Meanwhile, Miller oper income up $15 mil, 8.4% to $193 mil, giving Miller a healthy 15% operating margin in qtr and half. In 1st half 2000, Miller oper income up $32 mil, 10% and revs up 4%. That’s not bad. But Miller got middling trends on core brands: Miller Lite up 1% in 2d qtr and Gen Draft, High Life each down 1%. And Mil’s Best franchise down 5%, while acquired brands, Icehouse and Molson all down double-digits in 2d qtr.

AB had excellent qtr from just about every angle. As shipments up 4%, AB told Wall St that Bud family (2/3 of volume) up 5%. Bud Light "well on its way" to 9th straight yr of double-digit growth. Bud still ain't up but "rate of decline improved." Mich Light and Nat Light each up mid-single digits. AB sez it expects "domestic volume growth for rest of year will be about 3%" and just over 3% for full yr. While STR’s up nearly 4% in 1st half, AB pointed out that 2d-qtr STRs "benefited" because "retailer sell-in days prior to 4th of July weekend were at the end of Jun" this yr. This could have added 1 point to AB STRs in 2d qtr, according to Sanford Bernstein’s Bill Peccoriello. AB said 4th of July weekend sales were "strong" too. AB reduced inventories in 2d qtr. AB’s rev per bbl up 2.2% in qtr and almost that for half. Industry pricing "continues to be healthy as we move through the summer," said group veep Randy Baker. "All major brewers and importers" are "realizing good gains in pricing." Because of such "broad acceptance," AB "currently analyzing opportunities" for additional price increases and discount reductions in 4th qtr. Tho "plans are not final" looks like 4th qtr increases will be "slightly less in scope" than last yr. Still, AB raised guidance on rev per bbl slightly to 2-2.2% for full yr, incorporating assumption of some incremental pricing in 4th qtr. Strong volume and pricing led to very strong profit increases: AB earnings before taxes on domestic beer jumped $144 mil, 12% to $1.35 bil in 1st half. AB’s total corporate operating margin improved 0.5 to 21.9. This led way to 15% gain in EPS (earnings per share); AB’s 7th straight qtr of double-digit EPS growth. With "accelerated earnings growth momentum," AB split stock 2-for-1 and raised dividend. AB also getting profit boost from Modelo investment; equity income continues to jump 25-30%. In fact, AB raised guidance to Wall St for full-yr equity income to $190 mil net (that’s far more than Coors makes on its entire biz). And AB now expects to earn $30 mil from international biz in 2000.

AB’s 1+ mil-bbl gain--its 1st of that size since 1st qtr 99--is 2d qtr eye-catcher. Coors picked up shipments gain pace too, tho still well behind sales-to-retailers (STR) trend. Even Pabst had better 2d qtr. Of major brewers, only Miller didn’t improve shipments trend in 2d qtr. Meanwhile, imports continued to roll.

Despite these AB and Coors gains, total domestic brewers’ taxpaid shipments up just 250,000 bbls, 0.5% in 2d qtr, and 6-mo taxpaid shipments up just 400,000 bbls, 0.4%, according to Beer Inst. At same time, export biz and no-alc biz still soft. So total shipments by domestic brewers not much better than flat for 6 mos, and 12-mo trend up just 0.6%. Meanwhile, import shipments up 670,000 bbls 9% thru May. If imports had good Jun, might have grabbed 10 share of US shipments in 2d qtr for 1st time ever. That’s even tho Modelo exports (85% to US) off 0.5% in 2d qtr going against a 40%+ gain in 2d qtr 99. But Heineken told USA Today it’s up 13% YTD; and #2 Mexican brewer Femsa said exports to US up double-digits. Including imports, total shipments in US up about 1.2 mil bbls, 1.2% for 6 mos, 0.9% for 12 mos. This shipments data doesn’t square with better US retail trends reported by both AB (+3.9% YTD) and Coors (+6.5% YTD), plus better trends in supermarkets and convenience stores reported by IRI and ACNielsen where volume up 3-5% in 1st half. Other shipments/depletions trend gaps: Modelo brands are doing much better at retail than shipments gain; so is Guinness Stout.

AB total shipments up 1.025 mil bbls, 4.1% in 2d qtr, INSIGHTS estimates. (AB no longer reports this shipments figure; it splits tax-free biz between domestic and intl figures.) AB STRs in US up 3.6% same period. For 6 mos, AB shipments up 1.55 mil bbls, 3.2%, still lagging STR growth of 3.9%. Chart above shows AB 12-mo gain of 1.98 mil bbls, 2%. That’s

Change Shipments (000) Change Shipments

Shipments (000) Change Shipments (000) Change Shipments (000)
2d 00 2d 99 bbls % 6Mos 00 6Mos 99 bbls % 12 Mos %Chg
AB 26,050 25,025 1,025 4.1 50,175 48,625 1,550 3.2 98,350 2.0
Miller 12,175 12,530 -355 -2.8 22,425 22,630 -205 -0.9 43,970 2.4
Coors 6,389 6,181 208 3.4 11,216 10,915 301 2.8 22,255 4.1
Pabst 3,425 4,050 -625 -15.4 6,075 7,835 -1,760 -22.5 11,690 -28.0
Other Domest 3,031 3,149 -118 -3.7 6,059 5,975 84 1.4 11,579 5.7
Domest Total 50,600 50,400 200 0.4 95,060 94,985 75 0.1 185,999 0.1
Imports 5,625 5,178 447 8.6 10,013 9,146 867 9.5 18,764 5.6
Total 56,225 55,578 647 1.2 105,073 104,131 942 0.9 204,763 0.6 -
Exports 1,300 1,430 -130 -9.1 2,300 2,585 -285 -11.0 4,904 -10.4
Total US 54,925 54,148 777 1.4 102,773 101,546 1,227 1.2 199,859 0.9
(Molson USA volume included with Miller, Import and US Total Shipments; excluded from Domestic Total to avoid double-counting. Miller figures include brands acquired from Pabst May 99 forward. Same brands included with Pabst for earlier periods.)


a slower gain pace than Miller or Coors, but gotta note that Miller 12-mo figure includes almost 2 mil bbls of incremental growth from acquired brands (more below). Then too, AB got over 80% of its 99 gain in 1st half; it’s got far easier comparison coming Jul-Dec. AB needs 1.65-mil-bbl, 3.4% gain in 2d half to hit 100-mil-bbl shipments mark. Miller shipments off 355,000 bbls, 2.8% in 2d qtr, even with 1 mo of incremental volume bought from Pabst in May 99. Means Miller’s other brands dropped well over 3%. For 6 mos, Miller down 200,000 bbls, 0.9%, and that’s with about 600,000 bbls of incremental volume. We figure Miller's other brands down about 750,000 bbls, 3.5% for 6 mos. Miller needs big turnaround in 2d half to hit mgmt’s stated 2% growth goal. Ain’t gonna be easy given current trends and fact that Miller had relatively strong 2d half 99. For 12 mos, Miller up over 1 mil bbls, 2.4%, but that’s with almost 2 mil bbls of incremental volume of acquired brands. Without ‘em, Miller off about 800,000 bbls, 2% for 12 mos.

Coors shipments up 3.4% in 2d qtr; its STRs increased 4.8%. (Coors STR gain in US-only was 5.5%; see below for Coors comments on low inventories). Longer-term, Coors shipments picture looks even better: up 880,000 bbls, 4.1% for 12 mos. Apples-to-apples, Pabst brands down in low double-digits, tho chart above shows Pabst shipments down 23% YTD. Pabst’s 99 figure includes brands now sold by Miller. We estimate All Others, domestic brewers below top 4, off slightly in 2d qtr, up slightly YTD.

 

Everything on our website is protected by US copyright, trademark and other laws. By your continued use of this website you agree to respect our intellectual property and other legal rights.

© 2026 Beer Marketer’s Insights 49 East Maple Avenue, Suffern, NY 10901