Beer Marketer's Insights
Contract Conflict Thru Barton
Beer CPI Trend Continues to Exceed Inflation
Consumer price index for beer bumped up another 3.8% in Aug (vs Aug 03), while CPI for all items up 2.7%, wine prices stayed flat, liquor prices rose just 1.2%. YTD trends tell same tale: for 8 mos, avg beer CPI up 3.6% vs 2.5% inflation, just 0.1% wine price increase and 1.4% gain for liquor prices. Another view shows more aggressive beer-vs-liquor pricing in recent yrs. For 12 mos 2001, CPI for beer at home was 7 pts, 4.3% lower than spirits CPI. Thru Aug 04, beer CPI just 1 pt, 0.6% lower.
Miller STRs Up Slightly Over Summer
Aug Shipments Flat Again
Beer Institute filed “amicus” brief on distribs’ side in direct shipping case before Supreme Court, unavailable at presstime. AB prexy August Busch IV sent distribs memo about filing today, adding Beer Inst also “assisting” Wash Liquor Control Board and beer distrib assn in Costco litigation. August noted: “All of the Beer Institute’s legal fees for these two important matters are being exclusively funded by Anheuser Busch.” Gotta be a story in there somewhere.
Hmmm. This negotiation thing ain’t getting very far so far. “We have had limited conversations with Miller on this contract issue,” veep Tim Owston wrote distribs yesterday, “and there is nothing further to discuss.” Miller “appears not to recognize the impossible conflict” its amendment “creates for distributors,” he added. If a sale “involves our brands and those of Miller, Coors believes its right of exclusive negotiation is paramount” and Miller’s amendment “cannot create any right to exclusive negotiations for Miller—whether it is for the total business or just the Miller brands.”
Oh yeah, sez Miller. Take this from Miller sr veep Mike Jones this afternoon. “Miller does not believe, nor ever did, that the exclusive negotiation rights” in Coors agreement “ever applied to the Miller brands. It is becoming increasingly apparent that Coors is taking a highly aggressive interpretation of a contractual matter in order to exert unjustified control over the broader business of distributors.” Distribs, not to mention other suppliers, are caught in the middle.
Important Upcoming Meetings
Next week SABMiller will court financial community. Over 100 analysts will be in Milwaukee for many hours of presentations on progress of Miller turnaround. Then in Oct, several near simultaneous meetings. AB meets with distribs in Chi to discuss new amendments to AB equity agreement, focused on on-premise. Miller has regional distrib meetings to discuss 2005 plans, including its initiative to increase focus on subpremiums. Finally, Heineken having its natl sales meeting same days as AB meeting and at least 1 Miller regional meeting. If you're 1 of lucky few distribs that sell all 3, got some tuff choices to make.
Lower Ceiling for Low Carb; Budweiser Select
Mounting Issues for Molson Coors
TTB Takes Equivalence Out of “Serving Facts”
Not 2 months after TTB proposed optional “Serving Facts” label that suppliers could place on product and in ads, fed agency backed off 2 most controversial “facts”: info about “standard” drink size (0.6 oz of alcohol) and infamous “equivalence graphic”: 12-oz mug of beer = 5-oz glass of wine = 1.5-oz spirits. That’s right, 2d “white paper” released yesterday “removed…the drink servings logos and all references to a standard drink.” New “Serving Facts” label includes serving size, servings per container, and info on alcohol content, calories, fat, carbs and protein. (Editor's Note: Doesn’t a “serving size,” say 12-oz beer, 1.5-oz spirits still imply a “standard” serving?) TTB again asked for quick comments, in just 2 weeks. Gotta assume CSPI will grumble, and distillers not happy as brewers won this round on equivalence.

